WorldCon Schedule and Updatery

In two weeks I will be in London, at WorldCon, staying near Canary Wharf and hoping there aren’t any Cybermen lurking nearby.

This will be my third WorldCon, but my first time attending as an honest-to-FSM author. I’ll be wearing both of my writerly hats plus my bookseller one, with panels on bookselling and RPG writing and an autographing. If you’re there, and have a copy of Night Owls, I will happily scribble my name in it for you!

Here’s where you can find me:

How Does Bookselling Shape the Genre We See?

Friday 11:00 – 12:00, Capital Suite 2 (ExCeL)

This panel will explore how bookselling works, and how it’s changed over the past decade. How do booksellers and publishers interact, and what information do they use to choose what to stock, and how? How do these decisions affect readers’ image of the field? Have the habits and demographics of the book buyer changed? Are non-Amazon booksellers doomed?

Alex Ingram, Justin Ackroyd, Malcolm Edwards, Lauren M. Roy, Michelle Sagara

Medieval Languages and Distant Vistas: Using The Past in Games

Friday 20:00 – 21:00, Capital Suite 16 (ExCeL)

Although we might not notice it, history plays a huge part in modern gaming. Not only historical games such as Medieval War, but worlds created using our perspective of ‘historical times’, fantasy landscapes where the people speak with odd, archaic accents or cast spells created in ancient tongues. Why is history so important to games, and how is it used? Should we take more historical care in the way we present these people, places and tongues, and what sort of potential does the recreation of the past have for gaming worlds?

Emma Newman, Ada Palmer, Mel Phillips, James Swallow, Lauren M. Roy

Autographing
Signing: Ian R MacLeod, Ellen Datlow, Anne Lyle, Leigh Bardugo, Gabrielle de Cuir, Jenny Blackford, John Hornor Jacobs, Lauren M. Roy, Matthew Hughes, Den Patrick

Exhibits Hall Signing Space (ExCeL), 11am – 12pm

Writing Roleplaying Games

Sunday 12:00 – 13:30, Capital Suite 10 (ExCeL)

What makes an engaging Tabletop Roleplaying Game, and what ways are there to write these in order to appeal to people, to allow for the creation of varied and vibrant roleplaying spaces, and to create coherant, understandable rulesets? The panel discuss ways of presenting worldbuilding, character design and rule systems, as well as some of the recent developments in TRPG design that are pushing the genre forwards in interesting ways.

Melinda Snodgrass, Helena Nash, Emma Newman, Marcus Rowland, Lauren M. Roy

We tacked a couple of extra days onto our trip – I’ve never been to London before, so if there’s something we ought to be sure to see/do, let me know!

On the writing front, I am finishing up some freelance work and my world for Storium before I plow back into Adrift. Well, okay, back to Adrift after the next round of edits for Grave Matters, that is.

Also, look, look! Things that I have written appearing in meatspace!

From Green Ronin, Dragon Age Set 3 is now available in PDF form. The print edition’s coming out soon, too, if you’re partial to dead tree form.

From Pelgrane Press, Mythos Expeditions is coming soon! I’ll throw confetti and update with a link when it goes on sale.

I have other super-shiny news to share, but I’m holding my tongue while I await permission. Watch this space for more good stuff to come.

Burning questions: will I have to decide between hats and books when packing for London?

…oh my god, HAT SHOP AND BOOKSTORE TOUR OF LONDON.

RECOMMENDATIONS. GO.

Posted in books, gaming, geekery, writing | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off

Writing Fat Characters

It’s a safe bet that, at any given time, I’m in the middle of two or three or more books: work reading, research reading, pleasure reading. My pleasure read — which I’m otherwise enjoying* — just pushed one of my buttons when it comes to characterization.

The setup:

The main character (male) attends a meeting with a bunch of women he’s never met before. One of them – one – is described as plump. She is, of course, eating as she is introduced.

Several times throughout the rest of the scene, this character gets up to provide refreshments to the roomful of people. The scene does not take place in her house, so she is not the hostess. Although everyone else in the scene partakes of the food, only the plump woman is ever mentioned individually as eating. In fact, whenever she speaks, she talks with her mouth full. She sprays crumbs. All but one of her speaking lines in the chapter have an eating action associated with them, most of them unflattering.

The only other character who gets an eating-related action is the other male character present. He snags a bowl of popcorn and eats a handful. Difference being, we’ve had a couple books’ worth of characterization on this guy. Him taking the popcorn is more action than description. All it says about him, really, is he’s into the story being told. The moment is the prose equivalent of /popcorn.

The plump woman has been around for six pages. The only thing we know about her is she likes to eat, and never seems to stop. That’s it. That’s her characterization: fat. Likes to eat (see: fat.)

The author has several other scenes in the series that take place over the course of a meal, many shared with other female characters the narrator has described as beautiful. In those scenes, the food gets the kind of good, detailed description that can make readers hungry. To the author’s credit, the women eat as heartily as the men, and don’t seem to be ashamed at enjoying it.

But how the beautiful women eat isn’t really described. We know they eat the food. We know sometimes they ask for seconds. These women don’t talk with their mouths full, or slurp their coffee, or do any of the things that are associated with messy eating. Like with Popcorn Guy above, eating is an action the character does, not a statement about who the character is.

Now. Do I think the author intended to point and laugh at the fat character? No. There’s no reason for the reader to dislike this character, and simply by being in the group she’s in, she has to be pretty formidable. My guess is, to the author, those descriptions added details to the scene, made it feel more real. It’s a thing we do as writers, recording our characters’ quirks. It’s entirely possible that the author doesn’t view the talking with her mouth full or the crumb-spraying as negative descriptors.

But intent isn’t magic. It pulled me right out of the story, and every time that character’s dialogue tag or action came up, I cringed.

Here’s why.

I have a post that’s still only in head-draft form about my own anxieties when it comes to eating in social situations. It’s personal stuff, and I don’t know if I’ll ever get around to writing it, but one of the worries I want to unpack is this: I’m not a small girl. When I eat around people I don’t know, I am afraid of being judged: what I’m eating, how I’m eating it. So when a writer shows a fat character eating in an unflattering way, I see myself. And I think, Is that how people see me? Is the fact that I’m eating all they see, all they’ll take away from our interaction?

On one hand, fuck ‘em if it is. That says more about them than me. On the other, it still stings. Coming across it over and over in stuff I read means I internalize the hell out of it.

Let’s hop over to Supernatural,** specifically two episodes from Season 9: “Rock and a Hard Place” and “The Purge.”

You don’t see many fat characters in Supernatural. There’s a running joke (go ahead and read that with air quotes) that the CW is the network for thin, pretty people, so whenever I see someone who doesn’t conform to that standard, I brace myself. Usually for good reason. In “Rock and a Hard Place,” the one fat person in the chastity support group Sam and Dean join is constantly slipping extra cookies into her purse at the end of the meetings. When we first meet overweight Sherriff Donna Hanscum in “The Purge,” she goes for the box of donuts. When she looks up, there’s powder on her face from the one she bites into. The implication: these fatties can’t stop eating. And they’re messy and gross.

Now, Dean Winchester does the same thing. Gets the same mess of powder all over him. But it doesn’t feel like we’re supposed to laugh at him. Dean’s not getting mocked for his weight. He loves his cheeseburgers and pie, but he’s never fat-shamed for it. I’m sure there’s a whole post in there comparing the brothers’ vastly different relationships to food, but even when Sam is disgusted by Dean’s eating habits, it’s couched in terms of “you’ll clog your arteries,” not “ugh, you’ll get fat.”

I’m so tired of it, cats ‘n’ kittens, and it’s everywhere. Got a fat lady character? Need to add description? Show her eating! BOOM. DONE. AMIRITE?

Come on, writers. We’re better than that. We conjure worlds full of creatures that don’t exist and make them feel real. We create cities readers know as well as their own hometowns. We make fans experience the gut punch of a favorite character’s death. We have all these other characters who step off the page with the descriptions lavished upon them. The way this one’s cloak drapes, how the other’s hands flutter as she speaks, His smirk. Her laugh. But the fat one? Eh. Put a piece of cake in their hands and call it a day.

Next time you’re writing someone about who isn’t conventionally thin, go back and reread. Are they eating every time they’re on-camera? Why? Is anyone else? If not, and there’s food present, why not? If that’s your main descriptor, how about getting rid of it? How about thinking up other things that character can do that aren’t related to her weight?

If you can’t fathom non-food things fat people might do a) this is me side-eyeing your abilities as a writer and b) maybe spend some time perusing Shakesville’s Fatsronauts 101 tag to learn some shit.

I want there to be more fat characters in fiction. But I want them to actually be characters, not caricatures. Write them as people.

Because that’s what we are.

*I really do want to stress that I’m enjoying the books otherwise. They’re a fun read. I’ve giggled on public transportation at some of the lines. A friend recommended them to me, and I have in turn recommended them to friends. I’m not calling out the specific book or author because this isn’t the first time I’ve come across this sort of characterization; just the most recent.
**Before you say it, I know. Supernatural has a whole fuckton of problems with its women. That’s another post.

Posted in writing | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

How Not to Respond When Women Make Things

I put this out there on the twitters yesterday, so here ’tis again:

If your first reaction to an article about RPing written by a woman is to type “Dude, is she single?” Go slam your fingers in a door. Or anything else it takes to prevent you from typing and posting that.

If you later wonder why there aren’t more women in gaming, that shit is part of it. “A lady gamer! Maybe she will date me!”

Maybe we’d like to, y’know, enjoy our hobby (Hey guess what, it’s our hobby, too) without having to get hit on. Or reduced to single/taken.

It’s a thing that happens all the time, not just in the gaming community, but pretty much anywhere women exist on the internet. We’re reduced to “is she single?” and “She’s so hot/so ugly” and “WHOA. A GIRL.”

I don’t care if you think it’s well-meaning.
I don’t care if you think it’s flirty or cute.
I don’t care if you mean it as a compliment.

So do hundreds, thousands, of other dudes, which means we don’t have to just wade through one of these comments, we have to wade through fucking oceans of them. All the time. Sure, we can ignore them, but they’re always there. It’s tiresome. It’s boring.

Ignoring the “compliment” or shutting it down runs the risk of the exchange turning sour. Suddenly we have to deal with comments like “you don’t have to be a bitch about it,” or “why are you so sensitive,” or “I was just trying to compliment you, sheesh. Don’t you know how to take a compliment? Couldn’t you just say ‘thank you’?”

Women have to weigh the possible outcomes of pushing back, of saying I don’t like that or Please don’t or Could we focus on the topic of the article? Over and over and over and over. We have to wonder which poster is going to level up from “UR so hot lol” to rape threats when he’s told to cut it out. And who’s going to have our backs when it inevitably happens? (Hint: it’s getting better out there, but a lot of the time the crickets are louder than the voices of male friends saying “dude, not cool.” If you see it happening and you think it sucks, CALL THEM ON IT.)

When you ignore the content of an article to comment on its writer’s looks/relationship status, it sends the message that your work is not as important as your sexual availability.

It says I don’t actually care about what you think, what you create, what you have to say.

It says I do not take your work seriously.

It says I do not think of you first and foremost as a person.

If that is not what you intend to communicate, then don’t post it. You have a backspace key. Use it.*

On the other hand, if that’s exactly what you are trying to say, see my handy-dandy twitter guide above. Do it for each hand. Twice.

Before anyone suggests it’s just random clueless dudes who don’t know any better and are nice guys we swear doing it, bzzzt. It’s out there, happening all the goddamned time on a professional level, too:

See Neko Case’s reaction when Playboy said she was “breaking the mold of what women in the music industry should be.”

Wimbledon champion Marion Bartoli had to take time out from celebrating her victory to address commentator John Inverdale’s criticism of her looks. Which of course became as big a story as her win, if not bigger.

Kelly Sue DeConnick — who has been working in comics for years, and is currently writing an amazing Captain Marvel — was listed as “wife of Matt Fraction” in a news article about the guests at the Dublin International Comics Expo. None of the male creators (including Matt Fraction) got the same treatment.

When rocket scientist Yvonne Brill died, the New York Times led her obituary with how great her beef stroganoff recipe was, and how she followed her husband around when he switched jobs, and how she raised three kids. The paper’s concession was to drop the beef stroganoff mention and slip in the words “rocket scientist.” But kept the rest of her being a mom, bumping the stuff about, y’know, her career into the second paragraph.

Katherine Freese wrote a book about dark matter. The New Scientist review focuses on her experiences with Women! In Science!** before getting to what the reviewer admits is “the meat of the book” – the scientific discussion of dark matter. (Hat tip to Katie Mack (@AstroKatie) for this one. Are you following her? Go follow her.)

These are all off the top of my head. It happens all. the. time.

Don’t contribute to it.

*Better yet, don’t type it in the first place. You have control over your motor functions. The incident that sparked this piece was a guy posting “Obligatory ‘dude, is she single?’” on a message board I frequent. Same guy got very upset a few months ago when we were discussing Schrödinger’s Rapist on another thread, because it made it sound (to him) like women think men don’t have control over their urges. Aaaaand then goes and makes a post like this, implying he just couldn’t help himself. NOPE.

**Do I think we need to recognize women’s achievements? Abso-goddamned-lutely, especially since women’s contributions are so often erased or obscured. So the reviewer gets half-credit for acknowledgeing those scientists and their achievements. But the awestruck “it must have been lonelys”? Eh.

Posted in feminism, gaming | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

So About That Pre-order…

The disclaimer:

The views and opinions expressed on this site are my own, and not those of my employer. I have no insider knowledge about the negotiations going on between Amazon and Hachette — all I know is what’s out in the public sphere already. Okay? Onward.

The backstory:

Just about two weeks ago, readers who went on Amazon looking for certain current Hachette Book Group titles and backlist bestsellers discovered odd 2-5 week wait times listed on the site. These books included bestsellers like Stephen Colbert, James Patterson, and Malcolm Gladwell, but also hit midlist authors, books on the children’s list, Orbit titles, and even J.D. Salinger (not The Catcher in the Rye, though whether that will change if their stock runs low will be curious to see.) As HBG spokespeople have said, the books are in stock, and if Amazon were to reorder them, they’d ship right away.

Amazon also removed or lowered the discounts on HBG books. They implemented a new “feature,” pointing out books that are similar in theme to the Hachette title you’re looking at, but are cheaper.

The backstory’s backstory:

This isn’t the first time Amazon’s thrown its weight around when a publisher wouldn’t give it what it wanted. Back in 2010, Amazon pulled the buy buttons from Macmillan titles in a dispute over ebook pricing.

New bullshittery:

Now Amazon has pulled the pre-order buttons for Hachette’s forthcoming titles. Go ahead and search for James Patterson’s Burn, his September release. Can’t pre-order it. Can’t pre-order Cibola Burn, the next book in James S.A. Corey’s Expanse series, the acclaimed space opera that’s being made into a SyFy show. Can’t pre-order Ancillary Sword, the sequel to Ann Leckie’s Ancillary Justice — y’know, the book that’s taken every major SF award this year so far, and is a Hugo nominee for Best Novel?

What it means for authors:

Amazon is not afraid to harm authors to bully a publisher into doing what they want. Pre-orders matter to writers. If you follow your favorites on social media, you’ve probably seen tweets and posts saying “Hey, pre-order my book!” in the months leading up to publication. It helps the publishers know there’s demand ahead of time, gives them a heads-up that there’s early excitement and buzz. It lets them know if they’ll need to order another printing earlier than they’d anticipated.

Authors who have self-published, especially those who only do so through Amazon, ought to take note of this as well. Every now and then I see someone prematurely dancing on bookstores’ graves and hailing the age of Amazon. While I am on the record all over the place stating my doubt that bookstores will actually ever go extinct, if they do, don’t act surprised when Amazon eventually pulls this shit on you.

At the very least, self-pub/indie/author-publisher writers, don’t put all your eggs in Jeff Bezos’ basket.

What it means for readers:

Couple-few things. Amazon is not doing this for you. Don’t think that if they wear Hachette down, you’ll reap the benefits.

Those cheaper alternative books still aren’t the ones you were originally trying to order, the ones you came to them wanting to read. I’m not sure what their play is here. I mean, hey, maybe some buyers tried something new in the meantime and discovered a new author to like. Great! But Patterson fans will still want to know wtf happens to Alex Cross. Fans of both Harry and Pseudonymous Bosch will want to keep following their adventures.

Also, readers, kindly remember this is not on the authors. They have no say in what Amazon’s doing to their books’ availability. Don’t leave 1-star reviews because Amazon’s being a shitheel. Don’t pirate their books to make a statement. Don’t swear off their series.

What you can do:

Go to your local bookstore and buy books there. If you don’t have a local bookstore, visit IndieBound and make a new friend. If free shipping’s a dealbreaker, Barnes & Noble offers it to members with a $25 purchase, and their membership fee ($25/year) is cheaper than Amazon Prime ($99/year). I mean, talking about cheaper alternatives is a fair tactic, right?

Follow the #ReadHachette hashtag on Twitter. Recommend Hachette books you dug, maybe discover new ones. Pick ‘em up at your local indie, or B&N, or library.

A reminder: delaying shipment of currently available books, or keeping customers from being able to order forthcoming ones is simply not what good booksellers do. A bookseller’s job, their #1 priority, is to get books into readers’ hands. What does it say about Amazon that they are actively, willingly, keeping books out of readers’ hands?

Posted in books | Tagged , | 2 Comments

C2E2!

Chicago! I will be at C2E2 this weekend.

If you’re attending, I hope you’ll add my very first panel, ever to your schedule. On Saturday at 3:00 in room S402, I will join Kevin Hearne, Chloe Neill, Kerrelyn Sparks, and Jacqueline Carey for a discussion entitled Supernatural City. The panel will be moderated by Mia Garcia.

Look! A description:

Join Authors Jacqueline Carey (the Agent of Hel series), Kevin Hearne (the Iron Druid Chronicles), Chloe Neill (Chicagoland Vampires), Lauren Roy (Night Owls) and Kerrelyn Sparks (the Love at Stake series) on a guided tour of cityscapes populated by supernatural creatures, both friend and foe.

Afterwards, we all trek to the autographing area from 4:15-5:15, and I will scribble my name in your book if you would like.

I’m excited and nervous, and hope I can answer the questions and participate in the conversation coherently. If anyone wants to jump into the comments and drop some panel-member wisdom on me, I’m all ears!

Also, how geeked am I that going to cons is part of my job now? SO GEEKED.

 

Posted in books, writing | Tagged , , | Comments Off

Game of Thrones: Breaker of Chains

(Trigger warning: rape)

Here there be spoilers for both A Game of Thrones the HBO series and A Song of Ice and Fire. Proceed at your own risk.

I’m almost always in the read-it-before-you-see-it camp, which often puts me on Team The Book Was Better. Over time, I’ve come to appreciate how hard it is to translate every tiny detail from page to screen. Scenes get cut, several characters are rolled into one new, conglomerate character. Casting choices, filming choices, choices that boil down to how can we tell this story in X hours?

The first time I really got it was with the miniseries of The Stand. (Act surprised, regular readers.) Four nights to tell that sweeping story, with all the intricate plot threads weaving together. I absolutely did my share of “But that’s not how it happened in the book!” but I understood. Details change in the translation, and if you look closely, you can often see why, whether you agree or disagree with the screenwriters and directors.

The why of the rape scene in Sunday’s Game of Thrones episode “Breaker of Chains” utterly eludes me.

Well, no, that’s not entirely true. I can come up with several whys, but none of them make that scene any less infuriating.

For those not watching, Cersei stands vigil over Joffrey’s body in the Great Sept of Baelor. Jaime enters, tells the septons and guards to leave, and after a conversation in which Cersei begs him to kill Tyrion for murdering their son, he rapes her. It is clearly non-consensual, with her repeating “No” over and over, trying to push him away, and struggling. While saying no.

Westeros is not a nice place. This has been well established both in the books and throughout the HBO series. The writers aren’t pulling punches — how could they, when the deaths of Ned Stark and Joffrey Baratheon are so central to the plot? It’s a brutal world, it’s an ugly world, and not a single character is safe.

They have, however, been consistent. Ned and his honor, Brienne and her loyalty. This isn’t to say characters can’t change. Sansa Stark has long ago stopped believing life will be like the pretty stories of ladies and their true knights, even when Ser Dontos is playing Florian to her Jonquil.

Jaime Lannister’s whole POV arc in A Storm of Swords not only flips the readers’ perceptions of him on its head, it begins an arc that makes one of the previously most-hated men in Westeros (behind like, Joffrey, Viserys Targaryen, and Tywin Lannister to this point) into one of its more likeable*.

*I want to pause here and acknowledge that hooooooly shit is a lot of what goes on in the books and the series problematic. With regards to women, characters of color, sexual assault and more. Seriously, go read Sady Doyle’s piece. It’s brutally honest. Also for  reference: How to Be a Fan of Problematic Things. Okay? Okay.

In A Storm of Swords, Jaime and Cersei do indeed meet in the Great Sept of Baelor while Joffrey lies in state. They have sex. It is consensual. The evidence for this is both in the text, in Jaime’s POV chapter (excerpted at the Onion AV Club here— again, go read the whole article), and from George R.R. Martin’s comments in reply to a fan’s question on his blog:

Though the time and place is wildly inappropriate and Cersei is fearful of discovery, she is as hungry for him as he is for her.

That’s not how it happened in the episode. Martin mentions what he calls the “butterfly effect” of how differences in the show’s plotlines can affect the characters as we know them, I’m not sure this holds up for the Jaime Lannister Benioff and Weiss presented to us in season 3. He’s well into his redemption arc at this point, trying to put distance between the boy everyone calls the Kingslayer, the man who shoved Bran Stark out a window, and the man he’s trying to be. We’ve heard his speech about why he killed Mad King Aerys. We’ve seen him go back to save Brienne from Harrenhal and its bear pit. We watched him get disowned rather than give up what few shreds of honor he has left. He still loves Cersei, would very likely still kill for her. But rape her? It’s out of character.

And boy was it hard for me to type that last line. Isn’t that what people say about men accused of rape? Of men convicted of it? “Oh, he’s such a nice guy, he’d never do a thing like that.” So, yes, maybe Jaime is simply the Nice Guy Who Would Never Do That and Just Fucking Did. I mean, the draw of the series is that it shows how messy life is, how ugly things happen. How bad shit happens to good people and only very rarely do the perpetrators suffer the consequences.

But from a writing perspective, that feels just plain weak. Fiction is supposed to be less messy and senseless than real life. You don’t have a character take an action without there being a damned good reason for whatever it is they’re doing. You don’t have them act contrary to what the audience knows unless it’s for a reason. Sometimes, an action that seems out of character is a clue, or is part of a Big Reveal, but I don’t think that’s what’s going on here.

It’s been suggested that this was done to make Cersei seem more sympathetic. We’ve watched her pick off Starks and be a terrible person for three seasons, and now the writers are maybe trying to steer away from that image. Again, potentially accurate, but if so, that’s lazy fucking writing. If the only way you can think of to make a female character more likeable is to have her raped, kindly go flush your laptop down the nearest toilet.

Unfortunately, I think there’s something even more despicable at work here, and the more I think about that scene in the context of the last few episodes, the more I fear I’m right.

In episode 1, Arya kills Polliver. Fans cheered because he had it coming.

In episode 2, Joffrey is poisoned and dies. Fans cheered because he had it coming.

In episode 3, Cersei is raped by Jaime.

Go ahead and fill in that next sentence.

We’ve seen her be scheming and manipulative. Cersei Lannister is a character we love to hate. Tyrion told her that someday her joy would turn to ash on her tongue, and oh, we wanted to see that day. We did see it, in “The Lion and the Rose,” but I’m not convinced the writers thought it was enough. How do you punish a headstrong woman? How do you break her even more? How do you get her as low as she can possibly be? Rape her.

And another thing, with regard to Jaime’s redemption arc that I’d mentioned earlier: we’ve watched him trying to become a better man. Since he’s come back to King’s Landing (much earlier than he did in the books), we’ve seen Cersei reject him over and over again. But he’s such a nice guy, you’re supposed to think as she flinches away from that missing hand. All the good stuff he’s done — leading the battle against Robb Stark (good from Cersei’s perspective, since King Robb would have possibly equalled dead Joffrey), being held captive by the Stark bannermen, his time with Brienne, his friendship with her, and through it all, trying to get home to the woman he loves. Doesn’t Cersei see what a nice guy he is?

What a Nice Guy. How dare she reject him? Doesn’t she owe him?

Maybe I’m wrong. I hope I’m wrong and something in the episodes still to come will address this. But I don’t have a lot of hope for that, especially after reading this excellent piece by Genevieve Valentine, “It’s Complicated.”

Twice now, we’ve seen what were consensual (if highly problematic) scenes turned into rapes. The first was in the pilot, with Dany and Drogo. In the books, she’s a 13-year-old girl sold to a 30-year-old man, so if you said her ability to consent was non-existent, I’d agree with you. The same can be asked of Cersei, whose age when she and Jaime first had sex currently escapes me. Setting those questions reluctantly aside, however, the characters both consented. In their situations, they had the agency to say yes. What does it say that the show is taking those away for shock value (Dany) and quite likely Punishing the Bitch (Cersei)?

Will I keep watching? For now, yes. The show usually gets more right than it gets wrong. In rewatches, I’ll skip over that scene, or get up and refill my drink. But the trust I had in the writers has taken a serious hit, and I’ll be watching with a more skeptical eye than usual for quite some time.

I highly recommending reading every piece I’ve linked so far. Some further reading for you:

The episode’s director, Alex Graves, considers the sex consensual. Also gross, the person who interviewed him, Alan Sepinwall, also seems to think Jaime’s been deprived of his rightful sexytimes, stating: “Jaime in turn seizes the moment to finally perform the act he’s been denied of since the war with the North began, even if he has to get very rough at first to get what he wants.”

Show writer David Benioff at least recognizes that yes, that was a rape scene.

Alyssa Rosenberg, on what this means for the show going forward.

Time.com: “The Game of Thrones Sex Scene Can’t Be Both Rape and Not Rape” by Eliana Dockterman (thanks, Marty) I hadn’t seen Nikolaj Coster-Waldau’s quote on it. Sigh.

Also, as pointed out by Melissa McEwan at Shakesville: no one seems to be asking what Lena Headey thought of the scene. We’ve heard from several of the men involved in it. How about the woman at the center of it?

Vulture.com: “Yes, Of Course That Was Rape on Game of Thrones by Margaret Lyon

My friend Reuben Poling, at Dorkadia: “Jaime and Cersei’s relationship, fraught, and conflicted and generally fucked-up as it is, is also separated from the power dynamics that define the rest of their lives – a two-person feedback loop of mutual dependency, as much a bizarre expression of self-love as it is incest. Pressing the cheap, easy add-a-rape button that’s so common to “edgy” media doesn’t just do the source material and the characters a disservice; it cheats the audience.”

More as I get them.

Posted in books, entertainment, review | Tagged , | Comments Off

The 2014 Hugo Awards

The nominees for the 2014 Hugo Awards were announced Saturday, and whoa I have a lot of reading to do.

With how fast the internet world runs, I’m a little late to the reaction post party, but I have some thoughts and I’m sharing them anyway. So let’s get right to it.

First of all, I love how diverse the ballot is this year. I’m not even a little bit of a Hugo historian, so I don’t know if other years have been more representative, but damn. I’ve also seen it pointed out that rocketships are guaranteed to first-time winners in more than a few categories. Huzzah!

I’m happy to see that some of the works I nominated are on the ballot, sad for the ones that didn’t, and excited to read and experience most of the ones with which I’m unfamiliar. I have no idea how I’ll be voting yet — that’s what the Hugo Voter Packet will help me determine — and if I reveal my choices at all, it’ll be after the ballots are in.

First, though rejoicing for the works I’ve already read and seen! These are quick-hit reactions, by the by. I’ll save in-depth analysis for future posts.

By the categories:

Best Novel:
Orbit rocking the list with Ann Leckie’s Ancillary Justice and Mira Grant/Seanan McGuire’s Parasite!

The Wheel of Time series is on there in its entirety, due to a rule that allows a concluded series to be nominated if no individual works within that series have been nominated in the past. I’m a bit torn about it — the series has certainly had a huge impact on fantasy fiction. It was my introduction to epic fantasy. I would love to see some kind of special recognition or achievement award given to Robert Jordan and Brandon Sanderson, to recognize the body and breadth of the work, but I don’t know if I’m on board with giving it my top Hugo vote.

Best Novella/Novellette/Short Story:
I am woefully behind on reading shorter works. Again, hooray for the Hugo Voter Packet, which will wrangle them all up for me!

Best Related Work:
Wonderbook is on my list of books to pick up. Bumping that to the top of the queue in 3…2…1…

If you haven’t yet read Kameron Hurley’s “We Have Always Fought: Challenging the Women, Cattle, and Slaves Narrative,” hie thee to A Dribble of Ink now.

Best Graphic Story:
XKCD is always doing neat things. I’m geeked to see “Time” with a nomination here.

Best Dramatic Presentation, Long Form:
Gravity and Pacific Rim! (And yes, Frozen! but as earwormy as the tunes are, and as keen as I was on the way the ending was handled, my heart’s with the live action SF this time around.) I’ve not yet seen Iron Man 3 or Catching Fire.

Best Dramatic Presentation, Short Form:
<obligatory “Oh look, it’s all Doctor Who.”>

Which, yes, I am a fan. I don’t recall which of these were on my ballot, though I’m pretty sure An Adventure in Space and Time was. Look, William Hartnell is one of my Doctors, and I got all sniffly a few times during it, okay?

Also excited that The Five (ish) Doctors Reboot is on there. All kinds of fun.

And clearly I need to go binge watch the first season of Orphan Black.

Best Editor (Short and Long Forms):
Super excited to see Ellen Datlow and Ginjer Buchanan on there. I believe if you got a peek at my paperwork, Ginjer is my acquiring editor for Night Owls. Soon, ducklings, soon, I hope to see my editor Rebecca Brewer on this list. Like Mur Lafferty says here, I’d love to see some Orbit editors on this list, too. I fully admit my I-work-for-them bias, but they have published some of my favorite books since their inception, and I hope their hard work will be recognized.

Best Professional Artist:
/squee for Galen Dara, who does the art for Fireside Magazine.

Best Semiprozine, Fanzine, Fancast, and Fan Artist:
Not a lot of commentary on these ones yet. I’m familiar with the semipros on there, and a few of the fanzines. Greg is the podcast listener in our house. Research, research, research, and looking at art!

Best Fan Writer:
This list, you guys, this list! All the /happydances for the nominees. It’s going to be a damned tough choice. If you’re not familiar with the people listed here, you’re missing out.

John W. Campbell Award for Best New Writer:
As is always mentioned, not a Hugo, but presented at the Hugo Awards. I am, again, in a state of “Have heard these names but haven’t yet read their work.” I’ll be fixing that.

I’m disappointed to say there is controversy on this list, and frustrated that attention to it put a damper on what should have been a day of much rejoicing for many of the nominees. While part of me wants to call no further attention to it, and refuse to give the people who pulled the shenanigans the satisfaction, eh. If you don’t speak up and speak out, nothing changes, right?

The short version is, two authors on the list suggested their fans vote for the works they suggested (including other writers in addition to themselves), mainly to piss off the people in SF/F and fandom calling for more diversity in the genre. Bigger round-ups at File 770 and Radish Reviews, complete with fans of the two jumping into the comments at Radish Reviews and being… ornery.

First, go ahead and read (Hugo-nominated!) Kameron Hurley, John Scalzi (two posts), and Jim Hines on the matter. Okay? Okay.

I don’t have a problem with writers stating “Here are my eligible works.” In fact, I want to see those lists. I also appreciate the people who open up their own spaces for readers and fans to recommend their favorites. You get exposed to a lot of good new work that way. Next year, you can damned well bet I’ll have a post up stating I’m Campbell-eligible.

There is a huge difference between I made something I think is amazing, and hope you will think is worth voting for and vote for me so we can stick it to the people we disagree with. Vote for the works you read/watched/enjoyed because you like them and think they’re worth an award. Not because you want to piss off the libruls or “make heads explode” or whatever.

Rebuttals seem to be along the lines of golly-gee-gosh, we’re only doing what Scalzi and co did, which is disingenuous at best. People are smarter than that, and see right through it. It’s petty and petulant, and for the writers who orchestrated it, it’s downright unprofessional. I’ll still read their work as it arrives in the Hugo Voter Packet, and judge accordingly, but I feel rather disinclined to reward bad behavior. YMMV.

So, there we go. 2014 Hugo reaction post, DONE. Onward and upward!

Not that I expect much commentary on this post, but just in case, I think this recent strip from (Hugo-nominated!) XKCD about sums up my moderation policy:

XKCD -

Posted in books, writing | Tagged | Comments Off

Stretch Goooooooal!

Remember that awesomesauce Kickstarter I mentioned earlier, Storium?

It can now be revealed that I’m writing a world for it!

Cats ‘n’ kittens, have a gander at the this stretch goal burst:

At $49,000…
SQUATCHTOWN — Walk the mean streets of a city where Bigfoot’s not a legend and private eyes just might be nine feet tall. Take a walk on the real wild side where big heat meets big feet, and human and sasquatch worlds collide. (By Richard Dansky, author of Vaporware and head Clancy writer for Red Storm Entertainment/Ubisoft.)
At $51,000…
DOWN AND OUT IN THE KINGDOM OF COINS — Whether you’re registered agents of the High Guilds or illegal night marketeers wheeling and dealing under the noses of the powers that be, there’s only one rule in the Kingdom of Coins: murder, dark magic or new, weird blasphemies – anything sells. (By Adam Kobel, co-creator of the ENnie-winning Dungeon World.)
At $53,000…
THE HOLLOW — Quaint, remote Camden’s Hollow is famous for its abundance of ghosts and its hospitality for ghost hunters, but when you arrive for a weekend of orb-spotting, you find the town deserted … except for the restless dead. (By Lauren Roy, author of Night Owls.(That’s me omg)
At $55,000…
GOTHAM JAZZ — It’s the height of the Jazz Age. The height of Prohibition. Benjamin Franklin’s heirs — the Right Honorable Order of Thaumaturges — reign with their weird technology over an America gone strange, where masonry-domed city states hunker amid poisoned wastelands and munitions factories and beautiful women swill bootleg liquor in smoky speakeasies. (By Hugo and Sturgeon Award-winning author Elizabeth Bear.)

So, if you’ve been debating whether or not to be a backer, please consider reaching into your pocketses and giving Storium a try! At the $10 level, you get access to the beta, and can start playing instantly.

Meanwhile I’ll be over here, /fangirling at the other authors in whose company I find myself.

Posted in geekery, writing | Tagged , | Comments Off

The Measure of a Geek

Saw this Buzzfeed “What’s your Geek Number” quiz* making the rounds today, and I got a bit ranty about it on the twitterz. I’m porting those tweets over here, and expounding on them, because I figured it was time to stop spamming my followers. >.>

(*I’m loath to link to it, but eh. Go ahead and have a gander at the questions.)

From Twitter:

There’s a BuzzFeed quiz making the rounds about your “Geek Number.” And I get it, it’s a quiz on the internet, created for clicks. However.

It biases heavily toward comic book geekery, or “Have you seen ALL of X,” implying that if you haven’t, you’re not fan ENOUGH. If your favorite Doctor’s isn’t 1-8, it implies you’re not a REAL Doctor Who fan. And yet, most of the other fandoms it asks about are new. Sherlock! Supernatural! Harry Potter! So, becoming a fan of DW after the reboot is bad, but we’re ignoring other classic SF/F?

Also, questions asking geeks to wear some not-nice things as a badge of pride. Losing friends over canon arguments, skipping work for games. Oh, and several variations on “Do you judge people if they <do something that’s not geeky ENOUGH.>”

THIS IS PART OF WHERE THE FAKE GEEK GIRL THING STARTS. Measuring other people by how geeky they are/aren’t. Which is bullshit.

If you love a book, a movie, a fandom – from any decade – are passionate about it & want to share that with others, congrats, you’re a geek.

Even if you score a 1 on that ridiculous gorram quiz. We should be welcoming other fans, not telling them “You’re not fan ENOUGH.”

Right. So.

Part of what chapped my cheese is the idea that if you don’t consume a thing in its entirety, you’re not really a fan. Which, no. Look, I can binge-watch or binge-read with the best of them. But life happens. Other responsibilities take priority. Some times not only is there not enough time to devour a particular work from beginning to end, there’s also not always enough money.

The majority of the list is about more modern media. Which does not discount it, at all (you should see my DVR). But why doesn’t the older stuff count? The only things I’m seeing on here that’s pre-1980, at a second skimming, is the sneery jab at any Whovians unfamiliar with the show before Russell T. Davies picked it up and references to Dune, Lord of the Rings, and Star Trek: The Original Series. Geekery did not begin with GenX, dudes.

Where are some of the other new shows and books? Sleepy Hollow has an incredibly active fandom.  True Dective. Vikings. Teen Wolf. Where’s The Hunger Games and Divergent?

What about makery? Steampunk’s an obvious hole in the list. Knitting? I can’t tell you how many panels I’ve been to at cons where a sizable chunk of the audience gets out their needles. Couple references in there to fanart, but it’s more “Have you ever drawn your characters?” and ignores the artists on DeviantArt and tumblr who make a living off of their commissions.

And music. Oh my gooses, I just realized the quizmaker totally neglected filk.

Point is, there are so damned many ways to be a geek. We ought not make other people feel like they have to check off a certain number of boxes to “count.” If you love something and want to share it with others, you are a geek. Said my friend @fyriat:

YES. More geeks are a good thing.

If I can change directions slightly, there was something else about this quiz that left me feeling bitey: I sort of figured, when I saw the first 35 questions (39 if you count the 4 manga ones) were about comic books, this wasn’t going to go anywhere good. I checked a few of those boxes! But not, apparently, enough.

I’m annoyed at the sudden desire I had, when I read the text summing up my score that suggested I had a ways to go, to defend myself as a geek. Because y’know, as a woman, I don’t have to do that all the damned time anyway. I have written and deleted and rewritten and redeleted a line following this one laying out the ways I’m a geek, but you know what? No. Not this timebecause I can’t help but feel like doing so would undermine what I’ve said above:

If you are a fan of something you consider geeky then congrats, and welcome. You are a geek.

How about you share some of those things in comments? Introduce me to new stuff, or nerd out with me about stuff we both like. What’s your geeky passion?

 

Posted in geekery | Tagged , , | 8 Comments

The Storium Kickstarter is Live!

So I’m not burying the lede: like the post title says, the Storium Kickstarter campaign is live, and nearly funded after less than a day.

Let’s talk about stories and storytelling.

If you’ve poked about the blog at all, you’ve probably figured out that I like writing stories and playing in them. I don’t ever remember a time I haven’t been immersed in fiction in one way or another.

If I’m going to pick up a video game, 99% of the time it’s going to be story-based. Are there NPCs I can talk to? What do they have to say? If I go back to the town after I’ve completed a quest, do they say something new? (You don’t want to know how long my Dragon Age playthrough took. Once I realized my party’s dialogue was ever-evolving, I was stopping every few minutes to get Alistair’s and Wynne’s input.)

The earliest stories I told were some form of fanfic inspired by whatever series had caught my imagination. When my grandmother watched me during the day, I’d wait until she fell asleep during her soaps and switch the channel over to Super Friends. In my head canon, Green Lantern and I were BFFs, and Wonder Woman would come pick me up in her invisible plane and we’d go off and have adventures. A few years later, when our moms inevitably told us to shut off the Nintendo and go outside, we continued our Super Mario Bros. adventures on our own. Our backyards became the Mushroom Kingdom.

In college, I discovered tabletop roleplaying games. Time was, we were playing three times a week or more, as long as our GM had a chance to get some plotting in. We’re down to once a week now, because of jobs and that whole getting older thing. Once, I could game until 2 am, go to class, go to work, game again, and keep functioning enough to sustain a 4.0. Nowadays, not so much. But that doesn’t mean I’m not thinking about those stories during the week. We’ll come back to this point, so remember it. There’ll be a quiz later.

Because I need to talk about MMORPGs, too. I play on a roleplaying server in World of Warcraft. We have a thriving community, and we’ve been telling stories with one another for the better part of a decade now. We’re scattered across not only the country, but the world. It can be hard enough for this east coaster to stay up and RP with the west coast crew, knowing there’s story happening while I really ought to go the hell to bed. Our Aussie contingent (<3 Nat and Sam) are on the flip side of the diurnal from us, half a day into the future.

Hectic schedules, real life obligations, and writing deadlines mean that sometimes, our game night gets postponed a week. Or all of the above plus time zone shifts means trying to catch a guildmate for RP can be tough. We look for other ways to keep telling the story when we’re not logged in: RP by email, in-character gtalk sessions, collaborative writing on gdocs. A few people on our server have created a whole website where the community can go and interact and keep our plots moving along (shameless Feathermap plug!)

And right now, up and running, and maybe even rolling towards being funded on the first day, is the kickstarter for Storium, which is a shiny new online storytelling game. You pick a world or create your own, create your characters, and get the story moving. Time zone conflicts? Can’t get together in person to play with your favorite people? SOLVED. Storium lets your group play on their own timetable. Maybe you’re all online and the story’s flowing quickly. Maybe you add a scene during your commute, your friend replies during her lunch hour, and your Antipodean player joins in while you’re getting your beauty rest.

And look at the sandboxes you get to play in!

Right now, there are genre settings for you to dip your toes into: cyberpunk, urban fantasy, epic fantasy, horror, medical drama. When it launches, the Storium team have brought in an incredible cast of writers to create new worlds: Delilah S. Dawson, Stephen Blackmoore, Karin Lowachee are you fangirling yet? Because the stretch goals give you MOAR WORLDS to play in, including ones designed by Saladin Ahmed, Mur Lafferty, Andrea Phillips, and Leonard Balsera. AND there are hints at more stretch goals (and stretch worlds!) to come. /kermitflail

If your heart’s not already going pitter-pat enough, Storium founders Stephen Hood and Josh Whiting brought in some of my favorite people in gaming, publishing, and transmedia to be on their team: Will Hindmarch, Chuck Wendig, Mur Lafferty, and J.C. Hutchins. Seriously, look at that list of awesome people omg. Which means Storium is in excellent hands.

I’m super excited about this kickstarter, you guys. Let’s get it funded! Let’s get it beyond funded and open up ALL THE WORLDS.

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/stlhood/storium-the-online-storytelling-game

Posted in gaming, writing | Tagged , , | Comments Off